IQM vs. ^GSPC
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).
IQM is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IQM or ^GSPC.
Key characteristics
| IQM | ^GSPC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 31.86% | 25.45% |
| 1Y Return | 47.63% | 35.64% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.13% | 8.55% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.95 | 2.90 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.51 | 3.87 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.54 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.26 | 4.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.38 | 18.72 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.72% | 1.90% |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.66% | 12.27% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.91% | -56.78% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.86% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQM and ^GSPC is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IQM vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 31.86% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 25.45% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IQM vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
IQM vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IQM vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.86%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.